|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
King SolomonChapter 6The Message of the Covenant |
1 Chronicles 28:9 And thou, Solomon my son, know thou the God of thy father, and serve Him with a whole heart and with a willing mind; for the Lord searcheth all hearts, and understandeth all the imaginations of the thoughts; if thou seek Him, He will be found of thee; but if thou forsake Him, He will cast thee off forever. (JPS) (Emphasis added) Deuteronomy 27:15 Cursed be the man that maketh a graven or molten image, an abomination unto the Lord, the work of the hands of the craftsman, and setteth it up in secret. And all the people shall answer and say: Amen. Deuteronomy 29:17 lest there should be among you man, or woman, or family, or tribe, whose heart turneth away this day from the Lord our God, to go to serve the gods of those nations; lest there should be among you a root that beareth gall and wormwood; 18 and it come to pass, when he heareth the words of this curse, that he bless himself in his heart, saying: 'I shall have peace, though I walk in the stubbornness of my heart--that the watered be swept away with the dry'; 19 the Lord will not be willing to pardon him, but then the anger of the Lord and His jealousy shall be kindled against that man, and all the curse that is written in this book shall lie upon him, and the Lord shall blot out his name from under heaven; 20 and the Lord shall separate him unto evil out of all the tribes of Israel, according to all the curses of the covenant that is written in this book of the law. (JPS) (Emphasis added) Ecclesiastes 3:15 That which is hath been long ago, and that which is to be hath already been; and God seeketh that which is pursued. (JPS) The Greatest TragedyAccording to the Bible, King Solomon was the wisest man that ever lived or ever will live. It is highly probable that he was also the richest man that ever lived and he also possessed many other attributes that are highly regarded and sought after by mankind. Very few kings throughout the entire history of the world are as famous as King Solomon and few are so well remembered thousands of years after their deaths. Solomon was a very popular king, perhaps largely because Israel experienced great prosperity during his reign. Solomon’s great wisdom made him a figure to be highly respected. Since this was Could Solomon’s life have had far more significance than that which has heretofore been attributed to it? Who would give away the Ark of the Covenant, make a counterfeit ark complete with a counterfeit and perverse law and build a temple diametrically opposed to the plans of the L-rd? Did Solomon actually rule a much greater area than Israel? How did Solomon perpetrate so many serious transgressions directly against the L-rd, and yet, seemingly escape serious judgment? Perhaps a careful analysis of all aspects of Solomon’s life will produce startling information. First, however, it might be well to digress onto the fact that as it has been widely perceived that King Solomon was one of the best kings that Israel ever had, so was the perception of the author until conducting the investigations preceding this chapter. Superficial examination of King Solomon’s life produces the appearance of a life characterized by extraordinary success and blessing; however, a systematic examination of that life reveals what is undoubtedly the greatest tragedy of all time. Prince SolomonThere are few mentions of Solomon in the Bible until shortly before he was anointed king. We are told that he was the son of King David and Bathsheba. As one might recall, King David’s relationship with Bathsheba was the cause of much trouble for him, evidently much more than has normally been appreciated. The narrative of these events can be found beginning in 2 Samuel 11. A short recap of the story of David and Bathsheba begins with David walking on the roof of his palace and spotting the very beautiful Bathsheba bathing. He was infatuated and soon seduced her. Alas, Bathsheba was another man’s wife. Leviticus 20:10 And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death. (JPS) David’s affair with Bathsheba was fruitful and she summarily sent word to David that conception had occurred. This child was Solomon’s older brother that only lived a few days. Unfortunately, this all happened while Bathsheba’s real husband Uriah the Hittite was away serving in King David’s army. In a failed attempt to cover up this indiscretion, David brought Uriah back to town from the army and arranged for him to have some free time so that he could be with Bathsheba. To no avail, David hoped that Uriah would sleep with her so that her unfortunate manifestation of infidelity would not be recognized for what it actually was. Had this scheme worked, Uriah would have thought that the child was his and everything would have been covered up. Plagued with ill fate, King David could not get Uriah to sleep with Bathsheba even after many attempts. Finally, David implemented plan B, thereby arranging for Uriah to be placed in the front lines of battle after returning to active duty. When the battle grew fierce, King David had the rest of the troops withdraw from around Uriah correctly surmising that he would be killed. Some might consider this to be murder by proxy. Despite King David’s concerns about Uriah’s wrath, more importantly, 2 Samuel 12:10 Now therefore, the sword shall never depart from thy house; because thou hast despised Me, and hast taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be thy wife. (JPS) (Emphasis added) Some of the consequences that befell David’s household included the incident(s) of Amnon, Tamar and Absalom; but the first manifestation of judgment was that the child that Bathsheba was carrying whose conception initiated all of these events died seven days after birth. 2 Samuel 12:15 And Nathan departed unto his house. And the Lord struck the child that Uriah's wife bore unto David, and it was very sick. (JPS) (Emphasis added) 2 Samuel 12:18 And it came to pass on the seventh day, that the child died. And the servants of David feared to tell him that the child was dead; for they said: 'Behold, while the child was yet alive, we spoke unto him, and he hearkened not unto our voice; how then shall we tell him that the child is dead, so that he do himself some harm?' (JPS) EntanglementIf one looks at this very carefully, it is notable that Bathsheba is referred to as Uriah’s wife in 2 Samuel 12:15. If she is still Uriah’s wife, then she could not be David’s wife at this point. It is important to consider that David fasted and afflicted himself pleading with God for the child’s life for the entire seven days that it took for the child to die. Since it is very clear that David fasted and wept lying on the ground until the child died, it is absolutely certain that he did not marry Bathsheba during this period of time. If Bathsheba is still Uriah’s wife, then she is obviously not married to David in the legal sense. It is important to note that David did not marry Bathsheba before he went to comfort her – before Solomon was conceived. This is certain because there is a detailed account of his activities between the time that he quit fasting and weeping up until the moment he went in to comfort her. 2 Samuel 12:20 Then David arose from the earth, and washed, and anointed himself, and changed his apparel; and he came into the house of the Lord, and worshipped; then he came to his own house; and when he required, they set bread before him, and he did eat. (JPS) One would think that a wedding would have been included in this narrative of 2 Samuel 12:20 if one occurred. If the passage notes that he ate, washed and changed his clothing, it is inconceivable that a wedding would have been left out of a listing of the events of that day. David’s subsequent activities involve his comforting Bathsheba, and at some point, they got so comfortable that Solomon was conceived. 2 Samuel 12:24 And David comforted Bath-sheba his wife, and went in unto her, and lay with her; and she bore a son, and called his name Solomon. And the Lord loved him; 25 and He sent by the hand of Nathan the prophet, and he called his name Jedidiah, for the Lord's sake. (JPS) By the time of 2 Samuel 12:24, we see that Bathsheba is referred to as David’s wife yet in 2 Samuel 12:15 she is referred to as Uriah’s wife. Certainly no wedding occurred during this period so how can this be explained? One of the more obvious possibilities is that she was considered David’s wife because the two became one flesh and this can be and is frequently done without an official wedding. Nevertheless, she must have been officially married to Uriah at this time. She obviously would have been Uriah’s widow. Obviously this would leave a pedigree problem for one of the parties involved; however, this detail was apparently doctored. After all, the royal family must keep up appearances. There is a verse in Matthew that simply states that David begot Solomon by Uriah’s wife. Translators have attempted to clarify the passage a bit by adding words that are not actually in the original manuscripts. Many translations make note of this by separating the added remarks in brackets. If one ignores the translator’s inclusions then the verse clearly says that David begot Solomon by Uriah’s wife. Matthew 1:6 And Jesse begat David the king. And David begat Solomon, of her [that had been the wife] of Urias; (Darby) (Emphasis added) Matthew 1:6 And Jesse begot David the king. David the king begot Solomon by her [who had been the wife] of Uriah. (NKJV) (Emphasis added) Proverbs 30:5 Every word of God is tried; He is a shield unto them that take refuge in Him. 6 Add thou not unto His words, lest He reprove thee, and thou be found a liar. (JPS) (Emphasis added) Back in 2 Samuel 11, there is another mention of David marrying Bathsheba and this confuses the exact course of these events. That information is included as an element of other fine points of these exploits, but it is not necessarily sequentially or chronologically related to the continuation of the main narrative in chapter 12. In chapter 11, the information given says that David and Bathsheba were married after the period of mourning for Uriah. While mourning periods are not necessarily very long in contemporary society, in other times and cultures widows remained in mourning for months or years. 2 Samuel 11:26 And when the wife of Uriah heard that Uriah her husband was dead, she made lamentation for her husband. 27 And when the mourning was past, David sent and took her home to his house, and she became his wife, and bore him a son. But the thing that David had done displeased the Lord. (JPS) (Emphasis added) Deuteronomy 21:10 When thou goest forth to battle against thine enemies, and the Lord thy God delivereth them into thy hands, and thou carriest them away captive, 11 and seest among the captives a woman of goodly form, and thou hast a desire unto her, and wouldest take her to thee to wife; 12 then thou shalt bring her home to thy house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails; 13 and she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thy house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month; and after that thou mayest go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife. (JPS) (Emphasis added) Prohibited Degrees Remarriage It appears that Bathsheba projected the appearance of mourning for some time. It is possible that one particular manifestation of these events, to wit: Solomon, may have materialized inexplicably soon for prudent appearances. Since this appears to be the case, it seems highly likely that the exact time of his arrival might have been blurred a bit in order to keep up appearances. It is also relevant to note that the narrative mentions that after the period of mourning, Bathsheba bore David a son, but it does not say which son. Nevertheless, one should notice that according to the ordinance one was not ordinarily permitted to go in unto the captive woman before the battle and victory occurred. Isaiah 66:7 Before she travailed, she brought forth; before her pain came, she was delivered of a man-child. 8 Who hath heard such a thing? Who hath seen such things? Is a land born in one day? Is a nation brought forth at once? For as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth her children. 9 Shall I bring to the birth, and not cause to bring forth? saith the Lord; shall I that cause to bring forth shut the womb? saith thy God. (JPS) The reason that this theory can be put forth is because of all of the other characteristics of Solomon for which there is ample support. When all of the facts are considered together, it is certain that this must be the case because in Deuteronomy 17 we see the characteristics of the man we are studying. It is with confidence that we can conclude that since the Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou art come unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein; and shalt say: 'I will set a king over me, like all the nations that are round about me'; 15 thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the Lord thy God shall choose; one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee; thou mayest not put a foreigner over thee, who is not thy brother. 16 Only he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt, to the end that he should multiply horses; forasmuch as the Lord hath said unto you: 'Ye shall henceforth return no more that way.' 17 Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away; neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold. (JPS) Since Solomon was conceived in such a way that David and Bathsheba should have been cut off from their people, it should be apparent that Solomon could not have been an Israelite. If one is cut off from among a people, they are no longer part of that people. Therefore, Solomon was a foreigner. Furthermore, while it is certain that he was conceived out of wedlock, it is also highly probable that he was born out of wedlock and that David and Bathsheba attempted to cover up this fact by keeping his birth a secret and announcing his birth at a later time. Perhaps he was a thirty-pound (14-kg) baby or something to that effect. Deuteronomy 23:3 A bastard shall not enter into the assembly of the Lord; even to the tenth generation shall none of his enter into the assembly of the Lord. (JPS) It is of great interest to note that the word rendered "bastard" in the above translation is rendered “those born of a forbidden marriage” in the New International Version. The New Jewish Publication Society Tanakh renders this “no one misbegotten.” A footnote in the NJPS notes that the Hebrew meaning for the word mamzer - the word that appears in the original manuscripts here - is uncertain, but in Jewish law it would tend to mean the offspring of adultery or incest between Jews. While it might be vague whether or not Solomon was of illegitimate birth, it is absolutely certain that this was a forbidden marriage. Therefore, neither Solomon or any of his descendants down to the tenth generation should have been allowed into the assembly of the L-rd. It is not really possible to determine with absolute certainty what the dates of Solomon’s kingdom were despite the fact that there seems to be a reliable set of dates for the reign of King David. The Bible contends that he was 52 when he died, but historical records maintain an age of 53. This could well be a clear indication of the exact theory presented here. The Squalid ConceptionAnother distressing aspect of Solomon’s conception that is inescapable is that Bathsheba was ceremonially unclean because she had given birth just seven days before Solomon was conceived. David became unclean by touching her, and according to the Mishnah (Kelim 1:3 - 1:5), in this condition he imparted uncleanness to everything under, above or even near him. Please note that the following passage from the 1917 Jewish Publication Society translation calls “sickness” that which would ordinarily be called a menstrual period today. Leviticus 12:1 And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying: 2 Speak unto the children of Israel, saying: If a woman be delivered, and bear a man-child, then she shall be unclean seven days; as in the days of the impurity of her sickness shall she be unclean. (JPS) Leviticus 20:18 And if a man shall lie with a woman having her sickness, and shall uncover her nakedness--he hath made naked her fountain, and she hath uncovered the fountain of her blood--both of them shall be cut off from among their people. (JPS) Leviticus 5:2 or if any one touch any unclean thing, whether it be the carcass of an unclean beast, or the carcass of unclean cattle, or the carcass of unclean swarming things, and be guilty, it being hidden from him that he is unclean; 3 or if he touch the uncleanness of man, whatsoever his uncleanness be wherewith he is unclean, and it be hid from him; and, when he knoweth of it, be guilty; (JPS) Solomon was conceived shortly after his brother died (2 Samuel 12:24). This occurred on the seventh day after Solomon’s older brother was born; therefore, both David and Bathsheba should have been cut off from among their people. This could be stated differently with a phrase something like, stricken from the register of Israel, or perhaps cut off from the tents of Jacob, for examples. While it is clear that David was forgiven, does it not seem that the child conceived under these circumstances would technically not be an Israelite? How could the product of such a union be included in the register of Israel? It is impossible. It is conspicuous that Solomon’s parents were unclean and that he was conceived in uncleanness. One could juxtapose that concept with the idea of virgin conception thereby imputing freedom from the Adamic curse for consideration. BathshebaIt is significant that Bathsheba was the wife of a Hittite, one of the peoples that the Israelites were forbidden to mingle with. From scripture, it is not clear if Bathsheba was Jewish. There are some mentions of her father, but no clear genealogy. Furthermore, her father is named as Eliam in 2 Samuel 11:3 while he is listed as Ammiel in 1 Chronicles 3:5, so perhaps there was some question about her parentage. There is a general theory promulgated by some that Bathsheba’s father must have been one of the scouts that explored the land of Canaan back in the days of Moses and Joshua (Numbers 13:12 & 14:36-38). This is because the name Ammiel is listed as one of the scouts; however, this would require that he was more than 400 years old when Bathsheba was conceived, so there may be problems with that theory. We can conclude this because we know that the foundation of the temple was laid in the 480th year after the Children of Israel came up out of Egypt (1 Kings 6:1). Solomon would have been 16 during the year that the foundation was laid. It is apparent that two different names are listed as Bathsheba’s father and yet the Bible is the infallible word of G-d, so this leaves a puzzle. This particular issue has not received a great deal of attention; but it is worthwhile to explore a plausible explanation. There are several scenarios that could explain this. Consider the possibility that Bathsheba’s parents had been married some time and wanted children very badly, but to no avail. Then consider the possibility that in order to conceive they experimented outside their marriage in ways similar to the case of Abraham many years before (Genesis 16); however in this case, the wannabe father, the husband of her mother, was sterile and another man sired her. Then, as one can see, as far as Bathsheba would be concerned her father was the man that raised her, the husband of her mother. But he would not be her biological father, a man she may have never known or even known about. Perhaps there was only one instance of passion and this scenario could easily explain a listing of two fathers. There is another scenario recorded in the Bible that could also produce the phenomenon of a person having two fathers, but in this case, the scheme was not successful. Consider the case of Solomon’s older brother that died when he was one week old. If the plan that David and Bathsheba devised had worked, Uriah would have thought that he was the child’s father and her affair with David would have been covered up. In that event, it is likely that David and Bathsheba would have never told anyone including the child the truth about the conception. Then both the child and Uriah would have always believed that Uriah was his father. Perhaps this stratagem was not an original idea and had been successful one generation before. Due to many of the characteristics of Solomon that can be determined for certain, it is possible that Bathsheba was not Jewish. This may simply have been due to her alliance to Uriah. Bathsheba’s exact pedigree must be left to the Levites, however, because records and Jewish genealogical knowledge beyond that of the author would be indispensable. Some sources contend that both one’s parents must be Jews in order for the begotten to be Jewish. Enmity HouseIn other areas of scripture (2 Samuel 13-18) concerning the results of David’s affair with Bathsheba, one can see that this affair caused many problems, not only for David, but also, for his entire household and kingdom. Some of the more notable events included the affairs of Amnon, Tamar and Absalom. These events were the direct result of David’s affair with Bathsheba and could be construed by suspicious types to be an omen that the relationships within King David’s home were at times less than harmonious. A short recap of these events could read that Amnon became infatuated with his sister Tamar. He perpetrated a ruse to get her into bed whereby he deflowered her. Because of this, Tamar’s closer brother, Absalom, became very angry with Amnon and eventually perpetrated a plot of vengeance against him, thereby taking his life. Absalom fled outside the grasp of King David, but the king longed to see him and arranged for his safe return to Jerusalem. As time passed, Absalom managed to depose King David through a series of shrewd covert and overt actions. King David had to flee for his life. Absalom then took control of Jerusalem where he plundered the booty of King David’s remaining concubines. In the subsequent series of events, Absalom pursued David hoping to take his life, but David emerged victorious. Unfortunately, it was a hollow victory because Absalom the king’s beloved son was killed and great harm had been done to King David’s reputation. Nevertheless, King David ruled again. In consideration of the foregoing information, some could speculate that there may have been certain problems in the relationships between certain members of King David’s household. Today, some might describe such a household as a dysfunctional family, or use some other oblique term with similar meaning. In earlier times, that idea might have been expressed that they were literally at each other’s throats. 2 Samuel 12:10 Now therefore, the sword shall never depart from thy house; because thou hast despised Me, and hast taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be thy wife. (JPS) The Prince of PeaceIt is noted that David and Bathsheba named their second son Solomon. Solomon is actually Shelomoh in Hebrew and it is the word for peace in that language. Shelomoh has several variations of spelling and form and is frequently shortened to the familiar Hebrew greeting Shelom. Shortly after they named him Solomon, 2 Samuel 12:24 And David comforted Bath-sheba his wife, and went in unto her, and lay with her; and she bore a son, and called his name Solomon. And the Lord loved him; 25 and He sent by the hand of Nathan the prophet, and he called his name Jedidiah, for the Lord's sake. (JPS) There is no evidence that the advice on names was actually followed, but Solomon might have gone by the name Jedidiah until he ascended to the throne. Nevertheless, by the time he became king, we see the name Solomon. In this case, the name Solomon would mean “prince of peace.” This might be the reason that The Talmud says Shalom ("Peace"; Judges vi. 23) is the name of God, consequently one is not permitted to greet another with the word "shalom" in unholy places (Shab. 10b). The name Shelomoh (from shalom) refers to the God of Peace, and the Rabbis assert that the Song of Solomon is a dramatization of the love of God: "Shalom" to His people Israel = "Shulamite." "King of kings" in Dan. ii. 37 refers to God. "'Attik Yamin" (ib. vii. 9) refers to the Ancient One of the universe (see Yalk., Chron. 1076). The pronoun "Ani" (I) is a name of God (Suk. iv. 5). The first verse in Ezekiel ("we-Ani") refers to God (Tos. Suk. 45a). Hillel's epigram "If I [am] here everything is here" (Suk. 53a) is interpreted as referring to God. The divine names are called in the Talmud "Azkarot," or "Adkarata" in the Aramaic form. Divine names that occur in the handwriting of minim should be excised and buried in the genizah (Shab. 116a; Cant. R. ii. 4). God is named also Ha-Geburah ("The Majesty"; Shab.87a), but generally Ha-Makom. ("The Omnipresence"), accompanied with Baruk-hu ("Praised be He"). Recall that Jeremiah 4:10 Then said I: 'Ah, The Ascension of SolomonThe next significant event involving Solomon consists of his becoming the king of Israel at the age of twelve. Ecclesiastes 10:16 Woe to thee, O land, when thy king is a boy, and thy princes feast in the morning! (JPS) As one may recall, Solomon’s kingdom was established after some conflict with another of David’s sons, Adonijah. Incidentally, the name Adonijah means “my 1 Kings 1:5 Now Adonijah the son of Haggith exalted himself, saying: 'I will be king'; and he prepared him chariots and horsemen, and fifty men to run before him. 6 And his father had not grieved him all his life in saying: 'Why hast thou done so?' and he was also a very goodly man; and he was born after Absalom. (JPS) It is apparent from the accounts about Adonijah in the Bible, that for a substantial amount of time, he went about claiming to be the next king. Furthermore, it is evident that David did not interfere with this for a long time and we are told that David was getting old and in declining health during the period that these events took place. Some Bible scholars have concluded that David never wanted Solomon to be his successor. Nevertheless, the conventional view holds that Adonijah is a usurper. The question is, was he?Perhaps this material should be carefully reexamined to see if something might have been overlooked. Looking at 1 Kings 1, it is possible to probe more of this story of Adonijah and Solomon’s rise to the throne for clues validating or negating the conventional view. 1 Kings 1:9 And Adonijah slew sheep and oxen and fatlings by the stone of Zoheleth, which is beside En-rogel; and he called all his brethren the king's sons, and all the men of Judah the king's servants; 10 but Nathan the prophet, and Benaiah, and the mighty men, and Solomon his brother, he called not. (JPS) (Emphasis added) 1 Kings 1:11 Then Nathan spoke unto Bath-sheba the mother of Solomon, saying: 'Hast thou not heard that Adonijah the son of Haggith doth reign, and David our lord knoweth it not? 12 Now therefore come, let me, I pray thee, give thee counsel, that thou mayest save thine own life, and the life of thy son Solomon. 13 Go and get thee in unto king David, and say unto him: Didst not thou, my lord, O king, swear unto thy handmaid, saying: Assuredly Solomon thy son shall reign after me, and he shall sit upon my throne? why then doth Adonijah reign? 14 Behold, while thou yet talkest there with the king, I also will come in after thee, and confirm thy words.' (JPS) (Emphasis added) Considering the previous passage carefully, just what part of Nathan’s statement does not appear to be a lie? To put it another way, this is obviously a lie and it is evident that Nathan is cooking up an artless scheme here. This particular plot would be much too obvious to use in a novel, play or movie because nearly everybody would see through this unsophisticated ruse immediately. Notice that Nathan tells Bathsheba that she needs to talk to King David in order to preserve her life and that of her son. Furthermore, notice that Nathan will come in and confirm her words. Micah 3:5 This is what the Lord says: “As for the prophets who lead my people astray, if one feeds them they proclaim ‘peace’; if he does not, they prepare to wage war against him.” (NIV) (Emphasis added) As a pertinent side note, consider that this is written in the Bible, the infallible word of G-d. While everything in the Bible must necessarily be true, it is a conspicuous fact that this segment records the dialog of the characters; therefore, their lies are faithfully recorded. In faithfully quoting the lying words of the characters - and notice that there are quotation marks - the Bible remains absolutely true. Micah 3:5 Thus saith the Lord concerning the prophets that make my people to err; that cry: 'Peace', when their teeth have any thing to bite; and whoso putteth not into their mouths, they even prepare war against him: (JPS) The meaning of these types of passages may be somewhat different than that which is traditionally ascribed to them. Notice that in the JPS translation, the word “Peace” is capitalized and recall that the name Solomon means peace. NathanIt should be obvious that Nathan is motivated out of his desire to maintain his important position in the royal court. There may have been good reason for Nathan to be concerned about his position because this was not the first time that Nathan prophesied something that was not the word of the L-rd. Another recorded instance of Nathan prophesying out of his own heart occurred when David began thinking of building the temple. 2 Samuel 7:1 And it came to pass, when the king dwelt in his house, and the Lord had given him rest from all his enemies round about, 2 that the king said unto Nathan the prophet: 'See now, I dwell in a house of cedar, but the ark of God dwelleth within curtains.' 3 And Nathan said to the king: 'Go, do all that is in thy heart; for the Lord is with thee.' 4 And it came to pass the same night, that the word of the Lord came unto Nathan, saying: 5 'Go and tell My servant David: Thus saith the Lord: Shalt thou build Me a house for Me to dwell in? 6 for I have not dwelt in a house since the day that I brought up the children of Israel out of Egypt, even to this day, but have walked in a tent and in a tabernacle. 7 In all places wherein I have walked among all the children of Israel, spoke I a word with any of the tribes of Israel, whom I commanded to feed My people Israel, saying: Why have ye not built Me a house of cedar? (JPS) (Emphasis added) Considering the calamities that David normally experienced when he did not follow the word of the L-rd, he might have been especially displeased with a prophet that did not carefully tell him what the Nathan was not invited to Adonijah’s feast and was feeling spurned and alarmed that his position in the royal court is apparently imperiled. Therefore, he concocted a scheme to put Solomon on the throne, thus insuring an important position for himself if his plan succeeded. Unfortunately for Nathan, the plan has some nasty long-term consequences that he might not have considered. At the end of the following passage it is noted that this prophet will not be included in the register of Israel and this is one way of saying that this person is damned. Ezekiel 13:1 And the word of HaShem came unto me, saying: 2 'Son of man, prophesy against the prophets of Israel that prophesy, and say thou unto them that prophesy out of their own heart: Hear ye the word of HaShem: 3 Thus saith the Recall that the word for peace in Hebrew is Solomon or Shelomoh. Therefore, Ezekiel 13:10 might have a slightly different meaning than has traditionally been attributed to it. For example, it would be fair to translate the verse something like the author’s paraphrase: they have led My people astray, saying: Shelomoh, and there is no Shelomoh. Recall also that this is the title of the true Messiah. King David’s DeclineNathan’s scheme to put Solomon on the throne has a good chance of success because we know that David is old and not feeling well. In fact, we are told that he is very cold all of the time and there is a general consensus among scholars that he was senile. His chill was such a problem that David’s advisors found a beautiful girl named Abishag to lie with him to keep him warm. While Abishag slept with David to keep him warm and was one of the most beautiful maidens in all of Israel, it says he never had intimate relations with her, thereby confirming his feebleness (1 Kings 1:4). Solomon mentions some events in Ecclesiastes that have the oddest similarity to some of the events considered here. Recall the special nature of Ecclesiastes. Ecclesiastes 4:11 Again, if two lie together, then they have warmth; but how can one be warm alone? 12 And if a man prevail against him that is alone, two shall withstand him; and a threefold cord is not quickly broken. (JPS) Ecclesiastes 4:13 Better is a poor and wise child than an old and foolish king, who knoweth not how to receive admonition any more. 14 For out of prison he came forth to be king; although in his kingdom he was born poor. 15 I saw all the living that walk under the sun, that they were with the child, the second, that was to stand up in his stead. 16 There was no end of all the people, even of all them whom he did lead; yet they that come after shall not rejoice in him. Surely this also is vanity and a striving after wind. (JPS) Bathsheba’s PetitionDue to the problems in David’s household Bathsheba had good reason to be concerned about her future and the future of her son. The family problems in David’s household are likely why Solomon was not invited to Adonijah’s feast and this obviously implies that he was not in good standing with Adonijah. After all, Bathsheba would obviously have been viewed as the exact cause of most of the family’s problems. Since there was a tendency for such differences in this household to result in death, she really had good reason to be concerned. If a shrewd and unscrupulous prophet wanted to motivate someone to a particular course of action, this could be just the card to play. 1 Kings 1:16 And Bath-sheba bowed, and prostrated herself unto the king. And the king said: 'What wouldest thou?' 17 And she said unto him: 'My lord, thou didst swear by the Lord thy God unto thy handmaid: Assuredly Solomon thy son shall reign after me, and he shall sit upon my throne. 18 And now, behold, Adonijah reigneth; and thou, my lord the king, knowest it not. 19 And he hath slain oxen and fatlings and sheep in abundance, and hath called all the sons of the king, and Abiathar, the priest, and Joab the captain of the host; but Solomon thy servant hath he not called. 20 And thou, my lord the king, the eyes of all Israel are upon thee, that thou shouldest tell them who shall sit on the throne of my lord the king after him. 21 Otherwise it will come to pass, when my lord the king shall sleep with his fathers, that I and my son Solomon shall be counted offenders.' (JPS) (Emphasis added) Alarmed at the ominous prospects for the future Bathsheba becomes Nathan’s ally. Ezekiel 13:17 "Now, son of man, set your face against the daughters of your people who prophesy out of their own imagination. Prophesy against them 18 and say, 'This is what the Sovereign LORD says: Woe to the women who sew magic charms on all their wrists and make veils of various lengths for their heads in order to ensnare people. Will you ensnare the lives of my people but preserve your own? 19 You have profaned me among my people for a few handfuls of barley and scraps of bread. By lying to my people, who listen to lies, you have killed those who should not have died and have spared those who should not live. (NIV) G-d’s Choice of LeadersIf one looks carefully at the promise 1 Chronicles 17:11 And it shall come to pass, when thy days are fulfilled that thou must go to be with thy fathers, that I will set up thy seed after thee, who shall be of thy sons; and I will establish his kingdom. (JPS) (Emphasis added) 2 Samuel 7:7:12 When thy days are fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, that shall proceed out of thy body, and I will establish his kingdom. 13 He shall build a house for My name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever. (JPS) (Emphasis added) This clearly does not say for David to appoint a successor, but that After Solomon became the king, David mentions Solomon as G-d’s heir apparent, but from all other signs, one can conclude that he must have assumed that was the way things should be because he was senile during his final decline (1 Chronicles 22:9). Why is there no record of What is clear in the story is that Adonijah is seemingly setting himself up to be the king. However, upon careful consideration, one comes to the realization that Adonijah was not setting himself up to be the king, but that this was the successor that Isaiah 57:1 The righteous perisheth, and no man layeth it to heart, and godly men are taken away, none considering that the righteous is taken away from the evil to come. 2 He entereth into peace, they rest in their beds, each one that walketh in his uprightness. 3 But draw near hither, ye sons of the sorceress, the seed of the adulterer and the harlot. 4 Against whom do ye sport yourselves? Against whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the tongue? Are ye not children of transgression, a seed of falsehood, 5 Ye that inflame yourselves among the terebinths, under every leafy tree; that slay the children in the valleys, under the clefts of the rocks? 6 Among the smooth stones of the valley is thy portion; they, they are thy lot; even to them hast thou poured a drink-offering, thou hast offered a meal-offering. Should I pacify Myself for these things? 7 Upon a high and lofty mountain hast thou set thy bed; thither also wentest thou up to offer sacrifice. 8 And behind the doors and the posts hast thou set up thy symbol; for thou hast uncovered, and art gone up from Me, thou hast enlarged thy bed, and chosen thee of them whose bed thou lovedst, whose hand thou sawest. 9 And thou wentest to the king with ointment, and didst increase thy perfumes, and didst send thine ambassadors far off, even down to the nether-world. 10 Thou wast wearied with the length of thy way; yet saidst thou not: 'There is no hope'; thou didst find a renewal of thy strength, therefore thou wast not affected. (JPS) (Emphasis added) While it may appear to be merely coincidence that this passage of scripture mentions a number of characteristics for which Solomon is noted, it is conceivable that Isaiah’s mouth was not filled with obtuse drivel and that he was talking about specific people and events. Recall that Solomon was a son of adultery, at twelve may have been prone to sticking out the tongue, is noted for hedonism, possibly beneath trees, offered many offerings, built his home on a mountain, sacrificed in the high places, went in before King David to be anointed king by Zadok the priest, received large quantities of fragrant spices from the Queen of Sheba and maintained a fleet of ships traveling far and wide - etceteras. In fact, Solomon did actually send ambassadors to the netherworld. Obviously, the entire passage of Isaiah 57 is a direct reference to Solomon and the events of his reign. One will notice in Isaiah 57:5 that there is mention of slaying children and it is known that Solomon built temples to Moloch and Chemosh and sacrificed there. Sacrifice of children was an integral part of worship to these gods. It is critical to remember that it was of utmost importance that Israel should only appoint the king of G-d’s choosing and that Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou comest unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like all the nations that are about me; 15 thou shalt only set him king over thee whom the Lord thy God will choose: from among thy brethren shalt thou set a king over thee; thou mayest not set a foreigner over thee, who is not thy brother. (Darby) (Emphasis added) Song of Solomon 3:11 Go forth, O ye daughters of Zion, and gaze upon king Solomon, even upon the crown wherewith his mother hath crowned him in the day of his espousals, and in the day of the gladness of his heart. (JPS) (Emphasis added) There is actually a great deal of supporting information proving that Solomon was not G-d’s choice of kings. If one takes a critical look at the events involving Solomon, it becomes obvious that there is not one single thing recorded about this man that should be recorded about anybody. Ecclesiastes 8:14 There is a vanity which is done upon the earth: that there are righteous men, unto whom it happeneth according to the work of the wicked; again, there are wicked men, to whom it happeneth according to the work of the righteous--I said that this also is vanity. (JPS) (Emphasis added) Song of Solomon 3:11 Go forth, O ye daughters of Zion, and gaze upon king Solomon, even upon the crown wherewith his mother hath crowned him in the day of his espousals, and in the day of the gladness of his heart. (JPS) (Emphasis added) A Wife for AdonijahAlthough Adonijah was unsuccessful in claiming the throne, Solomon was gracious enough not to have him executed right away - at least not until after David died. It is interesting to note that, as a condition for Solomon’s initial mercy, Adonijah had to be found to be a worthy man by Solomon and he was. Shortly thereafter, the record of Adonijah’s request of Abishag’s hand in marriage appears (1 Kings 2:13-25). Abishag was the beautiful maiden that attended David while he was in his decline. The account states that David never had intimate relations with her so she was still eligible to be the bride of one of his sons. In making this request, Adonijah did not go directly to Solomon, but rather, he asked Bathsheba to approach King Solomon for him. Bathsheba agreed and therefore petitioned Solomon, her twelve-year-old son that is now the king. 1 Kings 2:13 Then Adonijah the son of Haggith came to Bath-sheba the mother of Solomon. And she said: 'Comest thou peaceably?' And he said: 'Peaceably.' 14 He said moreover: 'I have somewhat to say unto thee.' And she said: 'Say on.' 15 And he said: 'Thou knowest that the kingdom was mine, and that all Israel set their faces on me, that I should reign; howbeit the kingdom is turned about, and is become my brother's; for it was his from the Lord. 16 And now I ask one petition of thee, deny me not.' And she said unto him: 'Say on.' 17 And he said: 'Speak, I pray thee, unto Solomon the king--for he will not say thee nay--that he give me Abishag the Shunammite to wife.' 18 And Bath-sheba said: 'Well; I will speak for thee unto the king.' 19 Bath-sheba therefore went unto king Solomon, to speak unto him for Adonijah. And the king rose up to meet her, and bowed down unto her, and sat down on his throne, and caused a throne to be set for the king's mother; and she sat on his right hand. 20 Then she said: 'I ask one small petition of thee; deny me not.' And the king said unto her: 'Ask on, my mother; for I will not deny thee.' 21 And she said: 'Let Abishag the Shunammite be given to Adonijah thy brother to wife.' 22 And king Solomon answered and said unto his mother: 'And why dost thou ask Abishag the Shunammite for Adonijah? ask for him the kingdom also; for he is mine elder brother; even for him, and for Abiathar the priest, and for Joab the son of Zeruiah.' 23 Then king Solomon swore by the Lord, saying: 'God do so to me, and more also, if Adonijah have not spoken this word against his own life. 24 Now therefore as the Lord liveth, who hath established me, and set me on the throne of David my father, and who hath made me a house, as He promised, surely Adonijah shall be put to death this day.' 25 And king Solomon sent by the hand of Benaiah the son of Jehoiada; and he fell upon him, so that he died. (JPS) Let’s take a critical look at this event. Some thought has been given to this previously that supports Solomon’s actions, but are Solomon’s actions really defendable? Considering this analytically, his mother came to him with a request and he swore that he would grant whatever she wished, but what did he actually do? He refused her request and had Adonijah killed. Now, that would not be the mark of integrity, would it? Isaiah 57:1 The righteous perisheth, and no man layeth it to heart, and godly men are taken away, none considering that the righteous is taken away from the evil to come. 2 He entereth into peace, they rest in their beds, each one that walketh in his uprightness. (JPS) (Emphasis added) Isaiah 66:5 Hear the word of the Lord, ye that tremble at His word: your brethren that hate you, that cast you out for My name's sake, have said: 'Let the Lord be glorified, that we may gaze upon your joy', but they shall be ashamed. (JPS) Solomon was not concerned with honoring his mother’s request nor was King Solomon’s word reliable. It is interesting to compare this incident to similar events that are mentioned in the Bible. Take, for example, the story of Daniel and the lions’ den. To briefly refresh the story of Daniel and the lions’ den, Daniel was an exile that had risen to a high position in the court of King Darius (Daniel 8:1 et seq.). Some other officials that shared similar positions to Daniel became envious of him and devised a scheme to eliminate him. Therefore, they conspired to persuade Darius to issue a decree that anyone worshiping any god or praying to any being except King Darius for thirty days would be thrown into a den full of lions. This was because they knew that Daniel could not worship or pray to any god or person apart from YHWH. These officials set a trap for Daniel and also King Darius based upon a principle of the laws of the Medes and Persians that held that a decree from the king could not be rescinded and its terms had to be carried out. Apparently a decree could not be abrogated even by a subsequent order from the king. When these officials advised King Darius that Daniel was guilty of violating this decree, the king became greatly distressed because he held Daniel in high esteem and he realized that he had been duped. King Darius worked feverishly all day to avoid carrying out this plan, but to no avail, the course was set. Darius undoubtedly realized that he had been had, so he was not apt to have had warm fuzzy feelings for the conspirators. However, in that time a king’s word was expected to mean something and all of those concepts of ancient people that seem strange today, like honor and integrity for examples, were thought to be virtues, something highly prized in other times. This is obviously difficult to understand today when it has actually become expected that if a public person makes an utterance it is probably not true, but throughout most of history, people were expected to honor their word, even political leaders. Therefore, Darius had Daniel placed into the lions’ den overnight just as his royal decree required, even though he did not want to and now realized he had been duped. After Daniel was miraculously released from the loins’ den unharmed, Darius had the scheming officials placed into the lion’s den along with their whole families as punishment for their conspiracy. Of course, one could observe that, while Solomon could have honored his mother’s request, nothing would have prevented him from executing Adonijah at another time. It is also relevant to consider that it was certainly within the king’s power to restrict Adonijah’s movements and many other things if conspiracy was truly a concern. There are instances of those types of actions in scripture from around this time and Solomon used those techniques himself in several instances. Solomon Consolidates PowerAfter Solomon became the king, there were some loose ends from David’s time that had to be dealt with. David left to Solomon the task of dealing with several subjects, Joab and Shimei. JoabThe way Solomon dealt with Joab is of great interest because he had him executed at the altar right in front of the ark in the Most Holy Place. It is important to note that this incident occurred at the tent-tabernacle that David pitched in Jerusalem, so this happened in front of the real Ark. 1 Kings 2:27 So Solomon thrust out Abiathar from being priest unto HaShem; that the word of HaShem might be fulfilled, which He spoke concerning the house of Eli in Shiloh. 28 And the tidings came to Joab; for Joab had turned after Adonijah, though he turned not after Absalom. And Joab fled unto the Tent of HaShem, and caught hold on the horns of the altar. 29 And it was told king Solomon: 'Joab is fled unto the Tent of HaShem, and, behold, he is by the altar.' Then Solomon sent Benaiah the son of Jehoiada, saying: 'Go, fall upon him.' 30 And Benaiah came to the Tent of HaShem, and said unto him: 'Thus saith the king: Come forth.' And he said: 'Nay; but I will die here.' And Benaiah brought back word unto the king, saying: 'Thus said Joab, and thus he answered me.' 31 And the king said unto him: 'Do as he hath said, and fall upon him, and bury him; that thou mayest take away the blood, which Joab shed without cause, from me and from my father's house. (JPS) There seems to have been some confusion about whether there are any problems with the idea of killing somebody in the real sanctuary right before the Ark where the The story of Athaliah and Joash appears in 2 Chronicles 22:10 – 23:15. Athaliah had taken control of Judah after the death of her son King Ahaziah. When Joash, the only heir to the throne that was not killed by Athaliah became old enough to take control of the kingdom that was rightfully his, Jehoiada the priest helped restore the kingdom to him. During the uproar of establishing Joash as king, Athaliah took refuge in the temple to escape certain execution. Nevertheless, Jehoiada did not have her struck down in the temple, but had her extracted from the temple before she was put to death. 2 Chronicles 23:12 And when Athaliah heard the noise of the people running and praising the king, she came to the people into the house of HaShem; 13 and she looked, and, behold, the king stood on his platform at the entrance, and the captains and the trumpets by the king; and all the people of the land rejoiced, and blew with trumpets; the singers also played on instruments of music, and led the singing of praise. Then Athaliah rent her clothes, and said: 'Treason, treason.' 14 And Jehoiada the priest brought out the captains of hundreds that were set over the host, and said unto them: 'Have her forth between the ranks; and whoso followeth her, let him be slain with the sword'; for the priest said: 'Slay her not in the house of HaShem.' 15 So they made way for her; and she went to the entry of the horse gate to the king's house; and they slew her there. (JPS) (Emphasis added) According to the Torah, a dead body in the sanctuary desecrates it. Furthermore, priests were never to go near the dead - not even the dead of their own families with certain exceptions. The reason for this is that it made them ceremonially unclean and everything they touched would become unclean. According to the Mishnah, corpse uncleanness is one of the fathers of uncleanness (Kelim 1:1 – 1:5). Ezekiel 9:4 And the Lord said unto him: 'Go through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and that cry for all the abominations that are done in the midst thereof.' 5 And to the others He said in my hearing: 'Go ye through the city after him, and smite; let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity; 6 slay utterly the old man, the young man and the maiden, and little children and women; but come not near any man upon whom is the mark; and begin at My sanctuary.' Then they began at the elders that were before the house. 7 And He said unto them: 'Defile the house, and fill the courts with the slain; go ye forth.' And they went forth, and smote in the city. (JPS) (Emphasis added) Kelim 1:1:A. The Fathers of Uncleanness are: (1) The creeping thing (2) Semen (3) Corpse Uncleanness (4) A Leper during days of counting (5) Sin offering water of Insufficient quantity to be sprinkled. ShimeiThe other people that David left to Solomon to deal with are also notable because it is clear that Solomon did not exactly do what David asked. In 1 Kings 2:9 David specifically told Solomon to bring Shimei’s head down to the grave in blood, but Solomon allows him to live another three years. The account of how Solomon dealt with Shimei is found in 1 Kings 2:36-46. The following quote relates King David’s instructions. 1 Kings 2:8 And, behold, there is with thee Shimei the son of Gera, the Benjamite, of Bahurim, who cursed me with a grievous curse in the day when I went to Mahanaim; but he came down to meet me at the Jordan, and I swore to him by the Lord, saying: I will not put thee to death with the sword. 9 Now therefore hold him not guiltless, for thou art a wise man; and thou wilt know what thou oughtest to do unto him, and thou shalt bring his hoar head down to the grave with blood.' (JPS) King David mentioned on his death-bed that he wanted Solomon to execute Shimei, the man that cursed David. This has been interpreted various ways over the years with cursing taken to mean calling David bad names as in cussing out, or simply an insult. However, since King David was a man of war and became king through much bloodshed and strife, it is very safe to say that he had been cussed and insulted by many people. In fact, there are many instances of that recorded in scripture. The instance of Saul’s daughter can be cited as an example. 2 Samuel 6:16 And it was so, as the ark of the Lord came into the city of David, that Michal the daughter of Saul looked out at the window, and saw king David leaping and dancing before the Lord; and she despised him in her heart. (JPS) 2 Samuel 6:20 Then David returned to bless his household. And Michal the daughter of Saul came out to meet David, and said: 'How did the king of Israel get him honour to-day, who uncovered himself to-day in the eyes of the handmaids of his servants, as one of the vain fellows shamelessly uncovereth himself!' 21 And David said unto Michal: 'Before the Lord, who chose me above thy father, and above all his house, to appoint me prince over the people of the Lord, over Israel, before the Lord will I make merry. 22 And I will be yet more vile than thus, and will be base in mine own sight; and with the handmaids whom thou hast spoken of, with them will I get me honour.' 23 And Michal the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death. (JPS) Ponder the fact that David took no real action against Michal although it was in his power to do quite a lot. Recall also that he facilitated Absalom’s return to Jerusalem after killing Amnon, yet the king did not see him for two years - most likely because he was afraid of being overcome by his anger. There are other examples. Nevertheless, King David remembers this incident with Shimei years later when he is senile on his deathbed with pressing affairs of state. Recall that in 1 Kings 2:8, King David mentions that Shimei “cursed me with a grievous curse.” Despite various ways of interpreting this, it must actually mean that Shimei was a witch and this curse had little to do with cussing. If one wants confirmation of that, observe in 2 Samuel 16:7 that Shimei was saying something else while he cursed. The words he spoke would not ordinarily be considered cursing in the foul language sense. In all probability, this means that Shimei was practicing witchcraft while he hurled insults at David. Therefore, David dubs it a “grievous curse.” 2 Samuel 16:5 And when king David came to Bahurim, behold, there came out thence a man of the family of the house of Saul, whose name was Shimei, the son of Gera; he came out, and kept on cursing as he came. 6 And he cast stones at David, and at all the servants of king David; and all the people and all the mighty men were on his right hand and on his left. 7 And thus said Shimei when he cursed: 'Begone, begone, thou man of blood, and base fellow; 8 the Lord hath returned upon thee all the blood of the house of Saul, in whose stead thou hast reigned; and the Lord hath delivered the kingdom into the hand of Absalom thy son; and, behold, thou art taken in thine own mischief, because thou art a man of blood.' (JPS) (Emphasis added) Ordinarily, one would not really describe a cussing as a grievous curse, nor is it likely that such a thing would be remembered long. Probably everyone reading this has been cussed at some time or another, and it is highly probable that having been cussed will not be remembered on your deathbed. However, if this was an act of witchcraft that could have caused David enormous problems - that is to say a demonic act - it is possible that it caused many problems for David and was, therefore, a “grievous curse.” For one reason or another, and perhaps he was tricked, David did not put Shimei to death. Certainly, the subject came up because David’s troops wanted to kill him right then. However, David assured Shimei that he would not execute him. However, when he turns the kingdom over to Solomon, that is what he requests. Obviously, David’s promise only extended to himself. One should note that witchcraft was not permitted in Israel. There is very little information about the particulars of sorcery in the Bible, nevertheless there is plenty of scriptural evidence that these things exist. Exodus 22:17 Thou shalt not suffer a sorceress to live. (JPS) Deuteronomy 18:9 When thou art come into the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations. 10 There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, one that useth divination, a soothsayer, or an enchanter, or a sorcerer, 11 or a charmer, or one that consulteth a ghost or a familiar spirit, or a necromancer. 12 For whosoever doeth these things is an abomination unto the Lord; and because of these abominations the Lord thy God is driving them out from before thee. 13 Thou shalt be whole-hearted with the Lord thy God. 14 For these nations, that thou art to dispossess, hearken unto soothsayers, and unto diviners; but as for thee, the Lord thy God hath not suffered thee so to do. (JPS) Abiathar the PriestIn 1 Kings 2:26-27, one will find the story of Solomon removing Abiathar from the priesthood. This was not something that David requested and it should be a glaring question what authority a king would have had to remove a priest. Under the Torah, the Levites were separate in Israel. 1 Kings 2:27 So Solomon thrust out Abiathar from being priest unto HaShem; that the word of HaShem might be fulfilled, which He spoke concerning the house of Eli in Shiloh. (JPS) The Levites Deuteronomy 12:19 Take heed to thyself that thou forsake not the Levite as long as thou livest upon thy land. (JPS) (Emphasis added) Apart from the fact that King David never requested that Solomon remove Abiathar and that Solomon did not have the authority to remove a priest, one will notice that this occurred, "that the word of HaShem might be fulfilled, which He spoke concerning the house of Eli in Shiloh” The prophecy at ShilohThe prophecy at Shiloh was the word of the The prophecy at Shiloh The prophecy at Shiloh was largely fulfilled very shortly after it was given and Eli lived to see most of it come to pass. Eli died the same day as his sons after hearing of the calamity that had befallen them and the ark. The descendents of Eli were subject to shortened life expectancy through various unspecified tragedies - except for those that were cut off from the altar. This term is rendered more clearly in some other translations. Nevertheless, the key conditional point is that only one performance clause of this prophecy applies to priests that are cut off from the altar. If one examines the performance aspects of the prophecy at Shiloh, it becomes apparent that since Abiathar was cut off from the altar, the remainder of the terms of the prophecy at Shiloh did not apply to him, except for one point. It appears that Abiathar was exempt from shortened mortality and the like by virtue of being expelled as a priest. Therefore, the only remaining point of the prophecy at Shiloh that could possibly be fulfilled in 1 Kings was: “1 Samuel 2:32 And thou shalt behold a rival in My habitation...” (JPS) This is the unfulfilled prophecy from Shiloh that is fulfilled in 1 Kings 2:27. ” Ergo, this is not a reference to the priesthood or descendants of Eli per se, but rather, to someone described as a “rival in My dwelling” - meaning a rival to the Consider that for a few moments. The Second AnointingThrone of the L-rdOne need not look far into Solomon’s kingdom to find some astonishing information. In fact, looking immediately past his ascension, there is an account of his second anointing in both Kings and Chronicles. Solomon was anointed twice and one narrative of the second ceremony appears in 1 Chronicles 29:21-24. 1 Chronicles 29:21 And they sacrificed sacrifices unto the Lord, and offered burnt-offerings unto the Lord, on the morrow after that day, even a thousand bullocks, a thousand rams, and a thousand lambs, with their drink-offerings, and sacrifices in abundance for all Israel; 22 and did eat and drink before the Lord on that day with great gladness. And they made Solomon the son of David king the second time, and anointed him unto the Lord to be prince, and Zadok to be priest. 23 Then Solomon sat on the throne of the Lord as king instead of David his father, and prospered; and all Israel hearkened to him. (JPS) (Emphasis added) In this instance, we see that Solomon was anointed king a second time before the This is only thing that this could mean because this is the only place where the phrase that someone “sat on the throne of the Lord” exists in the Bible regarding a person. There are only two other instances of the phrase “throne of the Lord” being used in the entire Bible with the exception of its usage in one particular paraphrase translation. The other instances of this phrase occur in Exodus 17:16 and Jeremiah 3:17. Jeremiah 3:17 also refers to Jerusalem, something that will need to be examined in greater depth later. Nevertheless, even in these cases, this phrase definitely refers to the Ark. The phrase, “throne of the Lord,” does occur in different passages in the Contemporary English Version of the Bible. Specifically it appears in 2 Samuel 6:2 and Psalms 132:7. This was determined by using searchable text of the following translations: NIV, NASB, MSG, AMP, NLT, KJV, ESV, CEV, NKJV, KJ21, ASV, WE, YLT, DARBY, WYC and NIV-UK. In Psalm 132:7 in the Contemporary English Version (CEV), the phrase “throne of the Lord” refers to the Ark of the Covenant and in other translations it definitely refers to the ark, but the phrase is usually rendered “footstool” or “dwelling place” of the L-rd. In 2 Samuel 6:2 in the CEV, there is a description of the ark. Recall that God was enthroned between the two cherubim above the mercy-seat on the Ark of the Covenant. Therefore, 1 Chronicles 29:23 has to mean that Solomon sat down on the Ark of the Covenant and the full implications of this will be examined later; it is very important. While one would think that someone sitting on the ark would be immediately smitten, it is important to remember that touching the ark is not necessarily a death sentence because the Lord can have mercy upon whomever He chooses. Furthermore, In contemporary Western society, it might be a bit unclear as to why this would pose any problem. While it would have been unthinkable to sit upon a monarch’s throne in times before about the mid-nineteenth century, many people would probably think of it as no big deal today. Nevertheless, it was a big deal and a clear indication that there were aspirations of eminence far beyond being the world’s greatest king. There are actually ancient historical Jewish records of Solomon sitting on the ark in the Holy of Holies after the temple was completed. Obviously, these instances probably involved the counterfeit ark. The Throne of DavidThe Jeremiah 29:16 For thus saith the Lord concerning the king that sitteth upon the throne of David, and concerning all the people that dwell in this city, your brethren that are not gone forth with you into captivity; 17 thus saith the Lord of hosts: Behold, I will send upon them the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, and will make them like vile figs, that cannot be eaten, they are so bad. (JPS) Solomon Goes to GibeonOne of King Solomon’s notable early activities was that he went to Gibeon to offer sacrifices and burn incense before the 1 Kings 3:3 And Solomon loved the Lord, walking in the statutes of David his father; only he sacrificed and offered in the high places. 4 And the king went to Gibeon to sacrifice there; for that was the great high place; a thousand burnt-offerings did Solomon offer upon that altar. (JPS) (Emphasis added) The |